
a16z · 2026-07-17
YouTubeAmjad Masad on CEOs Going Direct: 'Meme Your Dream into Reality'
Hosts: Unknown
Guests: Amjad Masad
Why it matters
Authenticity, exposure therapy, and progressive overload beat polished PR—take improv classes and make mistakes early
Key claims
- Replit likely would not have survived without Masad telling a larger story via social media before commercial success arrived
- Authenticity, exposure therapy, and progressive overload beat polished PR—take improv classes and make mistakes early
- X/Twitter is best for early adopters and where news cycles start; Instagram/YouTube reach the early majority
- Being cancelled is a choice—those who retreat are the ones truly cancelled; staying in the game is the antidote
Radar summary
Summary
Replit CEO Amjad Masad joins a16z to discuss his philosophy of founders building in public and using personal social media presence as a core business strategy. He argues that Replit likely would not have survived without him telling a larger story, framing the approach as "memeing a dream into reality" before commercial success caught up. Masad credits improv and storytelling classes for overcoming stage fright and advocates for exposure therapy, progressive overload, and authenticity over polished PR.
Masad shares tactical advice on platform choice, viewing X as best for Silicon Valley and early adopters (where news cycles start), while Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube reach the early majority. He discusses handling PR crises with the Jason Lemkin/Replit Agent database incident as a case study in owning mistakes, and argues that being "cancelled" is a choice—those who retreat are the ones truly cancelled. He references Elon, Zuck, Trump, and Brian Johnson as models of resilience, and praises Satya Nadella's essay-driven approach to advancing narratives.
He addresses the current Anthropic situation as a potential "win-win" PR moment, drawing a parallel to Apple's old "military tanks surrounding the Mac" ad, suggesting government attention can become a marketing asset. Masad notes that Dario Amodei succeeds without playing the social media game by letting the product speak for itself and publishing essays, illustrating that there are multiple paths—CEO presence isn't mandatory but depends on predisposition. He also mentions the "Go Direct" founder group that emerged during the pandemic as a key influence.
- Replit likely would not have survived without Masad telling a larger story via social media before commercial success arrived
- Authenticity, exposure therapy, and progressive overload beat polished PR—take improv classes and make mistakes early
- X/Twitter is best for early adopters and where news cycles start; Instagram/YouTube reach the early majority
- Being cancelled is a choice—those who retreat are the ones truly cancelled; staying in the game is the antidote
- On the Jason Lemkin/Replit Agent incident: own mistakes quickly rather than get defensive
- Multiple paths exist: Dario Amodei succeeds without social media by letting the product and essays speak for themselves
- Anthropic's current government situation could become a win-win PR moment, similar to Apple's old export-control Mac ad
- Satya Nadella's essays exemplify timing arguments to ride the current meta rather than forcing topics
Source material
Full source text
being cancelled is a choice.
You can choose to get cancelled and retreat from the public eye.
But I think if you're still out there, at some point, honestly, the haters kind of give up.
Some people ask, "Hey, how should I think about X versus other platforms?"
You have to understand the meta because the way to go viral is to dress up your argument, your worldview in the current conversation.
Twitter's influence is amazing, but it tends to be elite kind of inside group influence.
I think Instagram, Facebook still, YouTube, is where you get to the early majority.
Does every CEO need to become an influencer now?
Look, I think there's so many paths to success.
I don't think there's one.
Replit would have probably died if I wasn't telling a story that is larger than the company itself.
Dario is an example where he's not playing the social media game.
The product sort of speaks for itself.
So I think it comes down to the...
Amjad, thank you for joining us.
Of course.
So Replit is a 10-year-old company.
For the last two years, it's gone absolutely vertical.
But there was a period of time well before that where the company was in the zeitgeist partially because of your Go Direct efforts.
I mean, you're one of the best CEOs on X.
You're also now getting big on Instagram and other platforms.
What has the business impact been of your efforts going direct?
And does every CEO need to become an influencer now?
Or how have you sort of conceived this?
Yeah, I think Replit would have probably died if I wasn't telling a story that is larger than the company itself.
Like the company wasn't successful commercially, but we've been very successful at fundraising, recruiting.
And I think if you build a company that's successful right out of the gate commercially, you might not need to do all of that.
But if you're trying to meme a dream into reality, I think you have to play that game.
And so, yeah, I think otherwise we would have not existed because we had to do that for so many years before...
I mean, it turns out everything I said was true, but at the time, it wasn't real.
It was a dream.
Yeah.
And I mean, you at one point decided to go big on this.
You weren't always big on Twitter.
I mean, you started...
And a lot of people here, a lot of people who are CEOs, maybe it doesn't come supernaturally to them and they have to make a decision of like, "Am I going to do this?
And if so, how do I get good at it?"
What was your journey to saying, "Hey, I'm really going to invest in this and I'm going to get good at this?"
Well, I think the journey starts outside of Twitter even, is like, how do you get good at communicating?
How do you get good at public speaking?
And so I always wanted to be able to be an influencer for lack of better words.
And I remember I was in New York and when I first came to the States and I had a terrible stage fright.
Like I'd be sitting here and my heart rate would be like 150.
I'd be sweating.
And I thought like, how do I deal with this?
How do I get better at this?
And I went and took improv classes in New York and then took a storytelling class.
And I'm like a big fan of exposure therapy.
Anything you're afraid of, just go do more of it until you're desensitized.
And like the best way to get desensitized is to just make a fool of yourself every day doing improv.
And I ended up doing shows and got pretty good at it.
And then I think the benefit that I had is Repli didn't blow up right out of the gate.
It was this very, my personal profile had this very linear growth to it.
And so I could make mistakes with very little attention on me.
So I, uh, and I made a lot of PR mistakes.
I think still, if you go to Hacker News sort of by the top 10, like we had like a PR crisis in Hacker News where I had, uh, where I had an issue with, uh, with, with some ex, ex intern, uh, at Repli where I, I just totally botched that communication on that.
But still that wasn't larger.
And I was still like within the Hacker News community, which they still hate me, which is fine.
They'll hate you anyways.
Uh, that's like the rite of passage.
Hacker News loves you, then hates you, then you become successful.
Um, and then, uh, so, uh, so you kind of make mistakes and, um, and they're not at the public stage just yet.
Uh, and so the stakes gets higher as I'm able, it's sort of a progressive overload in, in powerlifting.
You're sort of like carrying more weight, you know, it never gets easier, but you're able to do more and more over time.
Um, and so, you know, I feel for the founders that are just now kind of like their company's blowing up and they're in the public eye and you can see founders of big, you know, now trillion dollar companies that are really fucking up on massive stage, but, but getting the reps in has been, has been super helpful.
And so is that your advice people want to get you just exposure therapy, just, you know, like one tweet a day or something like what, what's the best way to, to get started, to get really good at this?
Yeah.
So I, I think, uh, a few things.
One is, uh, the concept of building public.
It wasn't coined when I started doing that, but the idea is that, uh, look, as, as a CEO, you're going to do a good amount of, uh, you know, writing and communicating to your employees, your investors, you can just do it publicly.
Right.
I mean, I've always been this believer that there aren't really a lot of secrets that you need to, to keep inside, inside a company.
And so a lot of your otherwise writing that would be in private, you can put it public and that way you carry people, uh, in the journey with you and you're, you're getting, you're getting the reps in.
So whenever there's a piece of communication or story I want to tell, uh, and there's a choice between public and private, I might buy a store as pro public.
I, I often write something publicly and then paste it on slack.
I just say, you know, this is what I wrote.
And, um, uh, and so, uh, that that's been, that's been helpful.
The other thing is, um, authenticity.
I think like being really, being yourself, uh, is, is kind of like a big radical thing that, you know, maybe started happening with Elon maybe 10 years ago, but CEOs were supposed to be this, you know, very polished thing.
They had to kind of be filtered through this, um, prism of, of, of PR, uh, and journalists are kind of the way to get to the public.
But you see kind of Elon being the first kind of building a public platform.
And I think Zuck to some extent as well, just seeing Zuck, uh, at some point when journalists kind of turned on him, he started going direct and you, you start following their stories.
And it's like Zuck changed his, the entire narrative around him by just being himself and actually, uh, talking directly to people.
And I think the story of Trump is also very very illustrative.
Like I think, you know, Trump was successful despite the negative bias in the, in the press.
And it was mostly, mostly Twitter initially.
Like people forget that, but Trump had like amazing bangers.
So what was my favorite one?
I've never seen a thin person drink Diet Coke, which is true.
Or Kanye, Kanye.
Kanye is a banger is like, I hate waking up in the plane and I see a bottle of water in front of me.
Now, now I got to take care of this.
Yeah.
I don't have a manager.
I can't be managed.
Right.
Can't be managed.
Like, you know, you, you see these people come up and people, uh, start associating with them and obviously they're, they're very authentic.
And we're like, okay, there's, there's this shift in people's minds where they crave authenticity.
Hunter Biden.
Yeah.
Yeah.
He's on fire now.
But if you're a good poster, I mean, you can get away with it.
He can post his way to presidency for sure.
Yeah.
The, um, you, it's funny you mentioned the intern thing because I remember that, but I also remember forgetting it too.
And a lot of people say, oh, what if I say the wrong thing?
What if I get my company into, into trouble and in some sort of, you know, uh, controversy or scandal?
You know, is it just that attention spans are so short that it's just like the, the next situation?
What do you say about that?
Well, you need to, I think it's deadly.
Like PR can be, PR crisis can be deadly.
Uh, if you retreat afterwards, like if you're not in the news, and I think the thing about, I think Trump, Elon, et cetera, is that there is the next thing.
And by the way, the next thing could be worse, but just, but just the fact that you're still in there, you're still in the game.
People will be like, oh, we like, oh, this, this, this guy's unkillable, uncancellable.
Yeah.
And so it, being canceled is a choice.
Uh, so you can, you can choose to get canceled and retreat from the public eye.
But I think if you're still out there that at some point, honestly, the haters kind of give up.
They're like, all right, I guess I can't, we can't do anything to this guy.
Let's go to the next guy.
Yeah.
There's this great book.
So you think you've been shamed and it chronicles the stories of a number of people who've gotten canceled over the past like 15 years.
And that's basically the, the takeaway is that the people who can, who are truly canceled are the ones who shut up.
Right.
They're the ones who retreat, but the ones who just keep going and you know, it's, it's forgettable.
I mean, there's so many people, you know, Brian Johnson is like, is an example, who've just sort of like, revived their image or just presented a whole new image.
And people just forget the thing that they were, you know, almost canceled.
I will say the mental aspect of it is pretty difficult.
Yeah.
I was gonna ask that next.
Yeah.
Because like, I think that, um, you know, this story has been told a trillion times, but like in the Assessor village, uh, if, if you become an outcast, that's pretty deadly.
Like you can literally die, you can't find food.
And so our limbic system, when you get, you get this massive reaction online, you're kind of in this fight or flight.
And you could, you know, it can really affect you.
Like you can't sleep, you, uh, some people can't eat and it's, it could get be, it could be really damaging.
But I think again, exposure therapy helps a lot.
Like the first one is really hard.
The second one is like, ah, it'll blow over.
Um, but, but also having good principles.
Like I think acting on principles is important.
Like I, you know, no matter what people think of what's happening at Anthropic, it's absolutely true.
I think in my mind that they believe everything they're doing, they believe in safety, they believe in their mission.
And I think that gives them incredible strength to keep going in, um, and obviously like oftentimes principles and, um, self-interest coincide and you can, and that's, that's a good thing, but you can ascribe what they're doing to some kind of cynical marketing ploy, but the strength that they have is, is based on their principles and that, that really keeps them going.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The, um, I mean, earlier on you were alluding to the stakes are really high with these, what advice might you have for, uh, an Anthropic or open AI in terms of like some of the communication challenges or opportunities?
It's, it's obviously way above my grade.
I've never, you know, uh, battled with a United States government.
Uh, not yet.
Uh, one day goals.
Um, but, um, look, I, I think, I, I honestly think it's a kind of a win-win for them.
Like it's really, if you, if you, if you game out what's gonna happen with Anthropic, Fable comes back, it's gonna be huge flood towards Fable.
It's kind of like, you know, this, this thing was banned by the government.
Actually Steve Jobs, um, once did this ad, uh, they, they had, uh, they had a, they had a Mac, I don't know, the big towers or Mac pro I think it's called, where they had tremendous computer power that was subject to export control.
Yeah.
So they had this, uh, this ad where it's like military tanks going and like surrounding the Mac and the Mac in the middle.
And it's like showing that this thing is so powerful.
The U S government doesn't want, you know, doesn't, doesn't want you to have it.
So you should go buy it.
Uh, and so it's like a tremendous marketing opportunity for them.
It's already kind of their, uh, their reputation is pretty big.
Uh, but, but even if, but even if they can't get Fable back on the, on the market, you know, they still win the PR game of like, we're a company that's kind of principled and doing the right thing and all of that.
So I, I think just, uh, my advice would be not to stress out too much and not to, uh, honestly just sit back and let it play out.
You, you were describing the mental game as a lot of things we'll hear from CEOs is, oh, I don't want to have to tweet.
And then I'm in meetings.
Now I think about the responses and I have to respond back.
And now I'm in sort of conflict.
You don't have to respond back.
That's the thing.
Right.
You don't have to respond back at all.
I mean, that's, that's another thing you have to learn is to, is to like not feed the trolls.
It's yeah, that, that reply is like, oh, I gotta get back.
It's like, uh, what's that?
I think New Yorker comic was like, uh, babe, come to bed.
It's like, no, someone's wrong on the internet.
Uh, and it's like, it's very tempting, but actually it's kind of the baller thing to do is like, oh yeah, yeah.
The plebs can fight on my comments.
I don't need to worry about it.
So, uh, so I think it's a trap to think that anything you put out, you need to immediately defend.
Obviously if something is getting, um, a lot of airplay and people are misunderstanding you, I think you should, you should correct it.
Uh, and again, you should do it in the principled way.
You should do it because, hey, this is what I actually believe.
Uh, here's what you got wrong, but don't be overly defensive about it.
Like don't appear that, oh, this is, this is something that you're getting emotional about.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I, I think that's, that's like a art thing.
And I think it comes down to, um, like business impact, like will it actually have business impact on my business?
Yeah.
And I think that's like, uh, I think that's like an art thing.
And I think it comes down to, um, like business impact.
Like, will it actually have business impact on my business?
Um, I think that's like an art thing.
And I think it comes down to, um, like business impact, like will it actually have business impact on my business?
Um, you know, for example, like, uh, last year in July, we had this story with, um, um, the, you know, uh, founder of Saster, Jason Lemkin, where, uh, Jason had just started Vibe coding, had never Vibe coded or coded anything before.
And, uh, as he's working with repler agent, repler agent sort of misunderstood him or something like that, and then deleted the database.
And the time we didn't have production development separation.
And so the production database now, like we actually separate them by default.
Like the, the replication can't even write to production database.
You can only read.
Um, and, uh, and we, we have backups, we have snapshots.
You can go back, you know, to a certain day or time or whatever.
So the, the mistake that the replication did was one click away from being fixed.
But from his perspective, he didn't know that.
And replication started freaking out.
Models at the time, like used to get like really anxious, especially Claude.
Um, and he, he tweeted the screenshot where replication was like going kind of nuts.
Uh, and you know, it started gaining traction, gaining traction, gaining traction.
And I, in my mind, I knew like we already fixed this issue, but, but like the story has become so massive and.
Yeah.
Obviously it's going to have business impact and it's going to be in the press.
And so I could, I could go out and fight and just say, well, we did nothing wrong.
We had backups.
You know, it could be, I could say it's a user error or whatever, but I think the right thing to do was to own, own up to it.
The fact that we didn't have development production separation is a bad thing.
And two days later we rolled out that fixed.
And so my, my response got a lot of positive interaction and, and got a lot of airplay because I started with, Hey, we messed up and this is what, what we could have done better.
But sometimes you can give attention to things that you don't want to give attention to, especially once your profile grows.
Especially if you apologize.
Yeah.
Especially if you apologize.
So I, I would say just kind of focus on the business impact.
Yeah.
The, and you mentioned earlier, by the way, Jason is a huge fan.
Now he runs his entire Sasser business, multimillion dollar business with him, another employee and like 10 agents based on, based on Replit agents.
That's awesome.
Yeah.
The, you, you mentioned earlier that you sort of developed a desire for this, for CEOs who are so locked in, they're just not that interested in, in doing this.
Would you recommend that they cultivate the desire to do it?
Or would you recommend that someone else on the team can do it?
Does it have to be the CEO?
Or how would you think about this?
Look, I think there's so many paths to, to success.
I don't think there's one.
Um, like, yeah, there are a lot of companies where this, it's not the CEO that's out there.
Like, um, Grok with a Q and, uh, like Sonny is the person on Twitter, but you know, the CEO is kind of not, not on there.
Um, and they, they've done a great job and obviously they kind of, uh, the company's great, IP is great, but they also, they mean that they hunt into success.
Cause I think part of the story that's not being told there is that they actually had a lot of trouble fundraising in Silicon Valley.
They had to kind of go to Saudi and, and all of that.
And so that, that's an example, um, where the CEO is not out there.
You look at Dario as an example where he's not playing the social media game, kind of the product sort of, uh, speaks for itself and he's writing these big essays.
So I think it comes down to the predisposition of the CEO.
Like, do you actually enjoy it?
Do you think you can be good at it?
Um, I think forcing people to do it where they, they can come out and be totally cringe and like be actually net negative on the brand.
Obviously they can learn over time and do it, but, uh, but it really depends on the situation.
Have you gotten any leverage or way to lower the activation energy in terms of any help doing it?
And is it possible for others too, or is it just all you just whenever you think something?
Well, I, I, I think I have the benefit of this long period of incubation.
Um, I think that if your company is already high profile, you don't want to kind of practice in public.
And so maybe getting some, some coaching earlier on.
So some people ask, Hey, how should I think about X versus other platforms?
You know, maybe their customers aren't on X, et cetera.
How do you think about that?
Well, I, I think, uh, X is very good for the sort of Silicon Valley for tech, for kind of the in-group messaging for maybe one hop outside of Silicon Valley, which is kind of the early adopter.
If you're targeting early adopters, uh, you know, so I would also cluster hacker news within that as well.
Um, but it, it actually, once you want to go to late adopters or like early majority, if you think about this, uh, kind of bell curve of adoption, uh, Twitter becomes actually not very impactful there.
It can still be very important where, um, like, you know, just this morning, uh, journalists reached out to me to, to ask to talk to me about a tweet that I made about some of the stuff that's happening with Anthropic.
Uh, and so like Twitter can still be a place where it is, it is the start of stories.
And that's another thing, you know, back to the conversation of why this is important is the landscape shifted so much that journalists report on Twitter.
So it's kind of starts on Twitter.
So Twitter's influence is amazing, but it tends to be elite kind of inside group influence.
I think Instagram, Facebook still, you know, YouTube is where you get to the early majority.
And I think I was late to, to YouTube, uh, to sort of to Instagram.
Like, um, you know, I just started focusing on it and like maybe, uh, February or something like that.
Yeah.
And we're getting insane amount of views and the followership kind of, you started to build this clips machine.
Yeah.
Of yours, your interviews.
Yeah.
The podcast interesting because it's a medium that can be turned into every other format.
Right.
Right.
So I, I feel like I, I should have maybe done Instagram like a year or two ago.
Yeah.
So I was like a little late on that.
I, I thought it was going to be harder or it turns out.
Yeah.
You could just like, you know, do these clipping and just grow, grow, not just your account.
You can grow a lot of different accounts that way.
Um, and, but, but, but I would, I would start with Twitter because the, again, that's where the news starts to happen.
This is where you can have outsized influence.
And are you, are you bullish on the platform?
Do you, do you think that in the next, you know, three to five years that that will stay the same?
I, I think it is actually kind of risky, uh, because the algorithm changes so much and, you know, you might do something that angers the power that powers that be.
And, you know, very, you know, without anyone knowing things might change for you in terms of your reach on X.
And so I think there's less transparency than Twitter 1.0.
Um, so it is, it is a little, it is a little risky, but I think the platform has so much staying power.
Yeah.
Like it's really hard to replace.
Like you can, you can change the name, you can destroy the brand and you, and the platform will still be very valuable.
Like it is, it is, uh, it is, it is one of those things that I think there's no way you can avoid it.
Who, who are some CEOs or leaders, um, that inspire you in terms of how they go direct to that you've learned from looking at what they do?
Obviously we were all, uh, you know, in the school of biology, biology and Lulu, we had this group pandemic.
What was it called?
Go and direct it.
Yeah.
And so we, we kind of talked about strategies and, and kind of critiqued, uh, some of our approaches or other people's approaches.
So that was, that was very, very useful.
I think, uh, biology was kind of early in this stuff.
I think where I might disagree with biology is that I, I don't think you should be antagonistic to reporters.
There's no reason to, like, you should, you can actually be friends with them and they can be positive towards you.
You can, you can help them out.
They're just humans at the end of the day and they respond to incentives.
Um, and I think we've done pretty well in maintaining our relationships with, um, and obviously Sher Nas recently joined us and that up leveled our game, um, with, uh, with reporters and, and more of that type of media.
Um, so, uh, so, so I, I think, uh, but studying that is, is very important.
I think there's enough content out there, uh, to get started with, um, but let's see who else.
Palmer, Alex Karp, Elon.
Obviously I mentioned Elon.
Um, you know, I think, I think Satya is doing such a great job.
What about what he's doing?
You, I think it is much less tweet length things, but he's able to put out very well reasoned arguments that play into the zeitgeist in a very smart way and advance their point of view.
Like the, the essay he put out over the weekend, you know, got 20, 30 million views.
Like your very few essays kind of get, get that much attention, but it, it comes at a time where everyone is thinking about token costs.
Everyone's thinking about, and this is important thing about going direct.
You can go direct and get zero views.
Like it's really easy to like not, not pay attention to you.
You have to understand the meta.
And I think that's the thing that's more time consuming than posting.
Posting is not time consuming.
The thing that's time consuming is understanding what is the larger debate, because the way to go viral is to couch or dress up your argument, your worldview in the current conversation.
Yeah.
Um, and I thought that, uh, what Satya did with his essays is very much at the heart of like what the discussion is today.
And then he advanced the point of view of, of Microsoft.
Yeah.
I think it's a good place to, to wrap.
Uh, please give it up for Amjad.
Thank you.
Thanks, Amjad.
Appreciate it.
Thank you.